Devon
4,904 planning applications from Exeter. Ask questions about them in plain English from ChatGPT or Claude — no coding, about two minutes to set up — or pull them straight into your own software. 15 pieces of information are filled in on at least 90% of records.
Exeter has approved 89.43% of the 3,671 applications it has decided since January 2023. Across the 225 councils with a comparable caseload the range is 71.37% to 99.14%, so this is at or above the middle of the pack (89.18%).
The mix of application types Exeter handles — useful for telling whether your kind of application is routine here or unusual.
| Application type | Applications | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Full | 1,707 | 34.8% |
| Tree | 944 | 19.2% |
| Conditions | 612 | 12.5% |
| Certificate | 465 | 9.5% |
| Listed building | 409 | 8.3% |
How approval rates and decision times vary across the country →
A "field" is one piece of information on an application — the decision date, the applicant's name, the address. Councils fill these in inconsistently, so this table measures how often Exeter actually provides each one, across all 4,904 records. Anything listed as reliable you can count on; anything lower, check the council's own record before relying on it.
Once this data is connected to ChatGPT or Claude you can just ask "what information does Exeter actually fill in?" and get these same numbers back. How to connect →
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Addressaddress |
4,904 | 100.0% | |
Application typeapplication_type |
4,904 | 100.0% | |
Description of the worksdescription |
4,904 | 100.0% | |
Date receivedreceived_date |
4,904 | 100.0% | |
Council referencereference |
4,904 | 100.0% | |
Statusstatus |
4,894 | 99.8% | |
Status (standardised wording)status_normalized |
4,887 | 99.7% | |
Case officercase_officer |
4,877 | 99.4% | |
Wardward |
4,841 | 98.7% | |
Applicant's nameapplicant_name |
4,779 | 97.5% | |
Agent's emailagent_email |
4,747 | 96.8% | |
Alternative referencealternative_reference |
4,699 | 95.8% | |
Decisiondecision |
4,648 | 94.8% | |
Decision datedecision_date |
4,648 | 94.8% | |
Decision (standardised wording)decision_normalized |
4,639 | 94.6% |
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Postcodepostcode |
4,299 | 87.7% | |
Who decided it (officer or committee)decision_level |
4,006 | 81.7% | |
Agent's companyagent_company |
3,905 | 79.6% | |
Agent's nameagent_name |
3,637 | 74.2% | |
Standardised typestandard_type |
2,021 | 41.2% |
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Appeal decisionappeal_decision |
109 | 2.2% | |
Appeal decision (standardised wording)appeal_decision_normalized |
109 | 2.2% | |
Agent's phoneagent_phone |
0 | 0.0% | |
Type of developmentdevelopment_type |
0 | 0.0% | |
Officer's recommendationofficer_recommendation |
0 | 0.0% |
Exeter's portal has been verified not to publish these fields at all — different from a field that exists but is rarely filled in.
Map coordinates (easting) Map coordinates (northing)
Connect it once with your email address, then ask questions like "which extensions were refused in Exeter last year?" or "what's the planning history of this address?" — no coding, about two minutes to set up. Setup guide →
curl -H "X-Api-Key: pk_..." \ "https://ukplanningapi.co.uk/v1/applications?council_id=256&limit=5"
Council id for Exeter is 256.
Full API reference for developers →
500 lookups a month, free. No card, no password — we email you a sign-in link and you're in.